Sunday, 1 February 2015

An Inquiry on Towers: Building on Children's Interests

I recently read an article titled "The Plan: Building on Children's interests" by Hilary Jo Seitz. In the article, "The Plan" is a four-step process that consists of sparks, conversations, experiences, and theories and more questions. It is circular in motion and often allows for different investigative directions to take place (Seitz, 2006). 

"The Plan" seemed very straightforward and logical to me. It further supported my thinking about inquiry and enabled me to reflect on a strong interest that was starting to ignite in the classroom. The four-steps spoke to me so much that I decided to share the concept with the students and co-construct our bulletin board display to include the headings as a guide during our tower inquiry. Below is our tower inquiry journey thus far. Please note that this is our interpretation. 


Sparks (provocations)—Identify emerging ideas, look at children’s interests, hold conversations, and provide experiences (Seitz, 2006). 



In December, I started noticing that many students were creating towers at various learning areas in the classroom. Having access to measuring tools (rulers, measuring tape), students were motivated to build towers as high as they could, then measure them to figure out how tall they were. Noticing this interest, I decided to place some books and pictures of different towers found around the world at the Construction Area and see what would happen. 



I started noticing that the tower creations became more intricate and involved, and since many students visited some of the towers in the pictures, there was an intrinsic connection to the structures being built.





















Conversations—Have conversations with interested participants (teachers, children,
and parents), ask questions, document conversations. Ask “What do we already know? What do we wonder about? How can we learn more? What is the plan?” (Seitz, 2006). 

As the interest in tower building continued, students became quite familiar with the names and appearances of various towers around the world. I then decided to start conversations with students as a whole group, during the sharing of their structures, as well as in smaller groups allowing for more in-depth conversations. I started by asking students what they knew about towers and what wonders they had.

What do you know about towers?

“When people build towers they start building the bottom first so they can make it stable on the bottom and make it taller.” O. S.

“People can go inside the Leaning Tower of Pisa!” K. E.

“We can go in the Chrysler Building.” E. E.

“At night you see the elevator of the CN Tower from outside and it looks like a dark blue car driving up it!” Z. G.

“Lots of towers look like a triangle so they can put the straight point and make it stable.” 
W. E.

“The Leaning Tower of Pisa was not straight up, it was leaning.” K. W.

“A skyscraper has a red light on the top that blinks.” D. A.

“So airplanes won’t fly in it.” Z. G.

“People that build stuff build towers.” C. D.

“Every night the Empire State Building lights up!” W. E.

“A really tall building is called a skyscraper.” M. S.

What do you wonder about towers?

“How many days did it take to build the Burj Khalifa?” O. M.

“How many towers can you go inside?” O. M.

“I wonder when the Leaning Tower of Pisa started tilting?” H. S.

“Who makes the material to build the towers?” E. E.

After asking this question, students started listing materials used to build towers.

1.         Metal                      6. Cement
2.         Wood                     7. Stones, rocks, pebbles
3.         Glass                     8. Concrete
4.         Paint
5.         Bricks

“How does the Leaning Tower of Pisa not fall down because it leans?” L. B.

“Why do towers look different?” W. E.

Opportunities and experiences—Provide opportunities and experiences in both the classroom and the community for further investigation, while documenting those experiences (Seitz, 2006). 

With the hopes of furthering their knowledge and supporting their explorations and investigations, purposeful materials and resources were placed at different areas in the classroom enabling students to self select and drive their own research and theories that were of interest to them.

Sharing personal experiences through dialogue and pictures also greatly supported learning. During the winter break, E. E. and W. E. went New York and took many pictures of the different towers they saw and visited. The knowledge they shared and the new information gained by their classmates was amazing and was evident in the various works created by students.

Below is some of the information that was shared by E. E. and W. E. with their classmates through dialogue and pictures:

"The Empire State Building has three elevators and one escalator and at the very top everything looks very small and you can see the Statue of Liberty!" W. E.

"We saw the whole world when we were at the top!" E. E.

"It had lots of windows. Why doesn't the Burj Khalifa have lots of windows?" E. E.

"This is the Chrysler Building, in the daytime the lights don't light up." W. E.

"It has lots more windows than the Empire State Building." E. E.

"It lights up at night to make it look pretty." W. E.

"The Empire State Building was the tallest building because when we were at the top the other towers looked smaller." W. E.

"Why do they all have points at the top?" K. E.

"Because that's how it goes thicker at the bottom and thinner at the top!" H. S.

"And so that when planes fly by they can see the tower!" E. E.

Experiences of exploration and investigation using purposeful materials:

















Theories—Think further about the process. Document questions and theories. In other words, teachers, children, and parents identify something of interest; we discuss what we know about it or what we want to know about it; we experience it or have opportunities to learn about the idea; and then we discuss what we did and either ask more questions or make new theories. We document our understandings throughout the whole process (Seitz, 2006). 

I noticed that the students were using the words tower and skyscraper interchangeably. So I decided to ask them the question: Is a tower a skyscraper? 

"They make towers strong and tall so they don't fall over." S. T.

"A tower is a skyscraper because it's tall and it almost touches the sky!" Z. G.

"A skyscraper is a kind of building that's called a structure. It depends how tall towers are. If you have a really tall building or structure, it's a skyscraper." O. S.

"But the Statue of Liberty looks like a person, it's not a building." P. I.

"It has doors; it's a statue and a building." Z. G.

"But a skyscraper has to be tall and it has to touch the sky like a tower!" W. E.

"A skyscraper is something that is really tall and has a sharp point at the top." F. D.

"A building has a lot of windows and a skyscraper doesn't have that much." H. S.

"A skyscraper is a really tall building that can touch the sky and has a point so it can scrape the sky." K. W.

"The CN Tower is not the same size as a building." M. O.
Thought about his house and how it's a building.
"The CN Tower is way taller than my house so it's not a building." M. O.

"Yea, my grandma lives in an apartment building and it's smaller than the CN Tower!" O. S.

This was an interesting discussion. Many different aspects were coming out of this conversation. What is a tower? What makes a tower a tower? What is a skyscraper? Is a tower a skyscraper? What is a building? What is a structure? In the end, there seemed to be opposing views by students. Some who argued that towers are little and skyscrapers are big. Others thought towers are taller than skyscrapers. It is not important who is correct but the critical thinking and reasoning they give to defend their theories. We will continue to investigate...

Just a few days ago, a new spark ignited yet another direction of investigation. During a group sharing, O. S. asked to share something she researched with her dad the previous night on the computer. I had no idea what she was going to share, but I loved the fact that her learning and motivation was extended to the home environment and brought back to our classroom.  She took out a piece of paper and told us that her dad and her researched how tall the CN Tower was in feet on the computer. As an aside, the students have some familiarity with the measurement in feet, which stemmed from our bat inquiry having had to figure out how high 12 feet was to place our bat box in the spring. O. S. showed me the written note her dad gave her to share with the class. I asked her if she could then write how tall the CN Tower was on our easel so we would remember. I was so excited, as I was hoping this may lead to students inquiring about the height of other towers leading to further explorations and investigations in comparison etc. The pictures below showcase the combined work effort of some students. I showed them how to use the computer and read the number to their friend who was writing on the easel. It was remarkable to step back and see how well they managed on their own. Most importantly it was nice to see how well they supported each other, how driven they were, and confident!





In supporting our current wonders, we will continue to converse, experience, and share new theories that arise from our research on towers.

Sunday, 7 December 2014

Exploring Measurement

As an entry point to learning about measuring length, I set up a provocation for the students with the the following questions:

Who is the tallest?

Who is the shortest?

How can we find out?

I also placed some non-standard units for length (cubes and Kapla planks) as well as standard units of length (measuring tapes) for added exposure.


As students made their way into the classroom, I sat back and observed. I was excited to see what they would do and use to answer the questions.

A few students read the questions out loud to everyone. They were very excited and quickly started to stand back to back to figure out their height in comparison to their friends. I was surprised that they took a different solution to figuring out the questions than I had anticipated. They didn't use any of the materials I set out. Instead, they worked as a group sorting and lining themselves from tallest to shortest in a line!




I was very proud of the way they self managed and used their critical thinking skills to find the answers to the questions without any guidance. 

But now I wondered how to motivate them to use the materials to measure length. They were no longer interested in measuring each other since they answered the questions posed to them.

I decided to add more to the existing provocation and use their interest of building tall structures as a possible motivator for them to use the measuring materials. I posed new questions:

How tall is your structure?

How can you find out?







They enjoyed using the non-standard units of measurement, but were particularly drawn to the rulers and measuring tapes available. I guided their learning by demonstrating the correct way to use a ruler and measuring tape. They wondered why there were numbers on both sides, so I showed them and explained the difference in spacing between the lines of one side versus the other. I didn't go into deep conversation about millimeters, centimeters and inches, but asked them to choose which side they wanted to use to measure their structures.

After a few days, I noticed that the interest in measuring structures was fading, maybe it wasn't meaningful to them or they didn't see the purpose for it. Instead students started measuring random objects and each other. I took this opportunity to once again change the provocation questions:

What can you measure?

What can you use?







During a group discussion on measurement, H. S. came up with a wonderful theory!

"If you're tall you have a bigger shoe and if you're smaller you have a smaller shoe."


I asked the students how we can find out if H. S.' theory is correct? They began measuring their shoes and then each other to find out. I felt this was a perfect opportunity to discuss the importance of using the same measuring material (constant non-standard unit) when comparing length. 

"Just as it is important for students to have opportunities to measure a length using different units, they need to measure different lengths using the same unit. This will give them measurement data that they can readily compare." 
-Big Ideas from Dr. Small, pg. 93 





I started thinking about the exposure my students have had to measurement thus far. I couldn't help but feel like something was missing. Something I try my best to do as an educator is make a link between learning in the classroom and it's applicability to our daily lives and the world around us. So I decided to ask the students the simple question:

"Why do we measure?"

Responses:

"So we know how tall you are." F. D.

"Cause they don't know how old you are and they're gonna wonder how tall you are." B. K.

"My cousin is five and I am four and I am taller than him." Z. G.

"We measure how tall we are." S. T.

"So we know how tall we are and how many bones we have because so our doctor knows how much we have grown." S. C.

"If some people are working and are putting in a new door, they have to measure how tall the door is so they know if the door will fit in the doorway." C. C.

"They use a measuring scale that measures height." M. O.

"How do we measure the weight of the class?" W. E.

"When my brother was in my mom's tummy, he came out before me, but I'm taller than him." E. E.

"So people know how big you are cause people want to know how tall you are." K. W.

"You can measure their weight with a measurer. It has a line thing and it's at my doctor's. S. C.

"He wants to know if you're too much weight or not enough weight. It's called a scale. It touches your head and a silver thing goes down." J. K.

"There's different kinds of scales because at my home I do have a scale and you just step on it and it tells you how heavy you are." H. S.

"B (brother) was born first and he's taller than me." M. S.

"I think if you are born first, whoever is born second they are bigger." E. E.

"It depends on who is born first in your family. A (sister) is six and she was born first and she's tallest." M. O.

"I was born first and I'm taller than my brother." C. C.

"But Z. G. is four and I'm four but he's taller?! M. S. is four but he's taller than me still!" E. E.

"J. S. is five and I'm four and I'm taller." O. M.

"D. A. is five and Z. G. is four and Z. G. is taller!" W. E.

"Maybe people get born at not the same time, that makes a difference of how old people are?" O. S.

The students' responses gave me a better idea of the knowledge they had about measurement. They seemed to be aware that measuring also entailed mass and time, not just length.

The discussion of age and its relation to height also continued to be debated by the students. This led to the co-creation of a chart displaying their name, age, and height. 











After the chart was completed, we studied the data together. Students noticed that being older didn't necessarily mean they were taller. Someone who is older can be shorter than someone who is younger.  

"There is examples for both theories! It tells me maybe both are right!" Z. G.

"Maybe families are different sizes because not everyone is born at the same time." O. S.

"Maybe different families get different things?" M. O.

"I think it depends on how much you eat and how much you grow." H. S.

I am glad I asked the question, "Why do we measure?". It provided insightful responses and generated a purposeful investigation that was meaningful to the students and motivated them to further develop their measuring skills.